About Me



A recent graduate with a master's degree in Statistics, I enjoy creating nuanced insight from data. My goal is to inform and improve institutional decision-making. Trained in multivariate data analysis, predictive modeling, computational methods for optimization, and machine learning techniques. Experience in data cleaning, visualization, and analysis.

Outside of my career: I enjoy learning about different cultures, cooking, dog-walking, and swimming.


Experiences


Data Analyst

  • Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
  • March 2022-November 2023
  • Position: Data Analyst
  • Advise scientists and engineers in their study design, methods development, statistical analysis, and data wrangling issues.
  • Develop script files in R, Python, and SQL that wrangle and store large data sets or output visualization and analysis.
  • Document data products and provide quality assurance testing to programmers, scientists, and research technicians.

 

Education


Master of Science in Statistics

  • California State University, Fullerton (2022)

 

Education


Bachelor of Arts in International Relations

  • Claremont McKenna College
  • 2010-2014
  • Advisors: Heather L. Ferguson, Kristin E. Fabbe
  • Scholarship: McKenna Merit Scholarship

 

Projects


Does Personality Pick the Poison?

The survey data, ICPSR 36536, is maintained by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research from the University of Michigan. The analysis I conducted for my Machine Learning course was motivated by the desire to understand who is at greater risk of using and abusing specific drugs. The analysis identifies clustering of the data and creates models for prediction, specifically whether someone is a user of a drug in the past decade. See more details here.

 

Projects


Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

This is a selection I wrote for a group project on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC). Briefly, the HMC uses physical system dynamics to predict future states in the Markov Chain. The trajectory found by these Hamiltonian dynamics is evaluated by the “leapfrog” symplectic integrator. The proposals are then selected using standard Metropolis procedure. The acceptance rate is typically very high (>70%) compared to other methods of deriving samples like standard Metropolis or Gibbs. See more details here.